jerry
New Member
Posts: 7
|
Post by jerry on Aug 3, 2009 20:51:29 GMT -5
Is there a way to indicate, in a family, that it is known that there is "No Issue"?
I have been creating a "child" by that name (No Issue, LastName)...but wondered if there is a check box somewhere, or other way to do this... since there really isn't a "no issue" person!
Thanks.
|
|
|
|
Post by Howard Metcalfe on Aug 5, 2009 11:04:08 GMT -5
Is there a way to indicate, in a family, that it is known that there is "No Issue"? I have been creating a "child" by that name (No Issue, LastName)...but wondered if there is a check box somewhere, or other way to do this... since there really isn't a "no issue" person! Thanks. Sorry, there's no way. I usually enter this into the notes, which in PAWriter are the primary items of interest. I don't know of any program that does have this feature. I think this is in the same category as "never married," "never baptized," etc. Best regards, Howard |
|
texast
New Member
Recent born-again Mac user
Posts: 2 
|
Post by texast on Aug 26, 2009 4:38:29 GMT -5
Is there a way to indicate, in a family, that it is known that there is "No Issue"? I don't know of any program that does have this feature. Legacy for Windows does. Now that you're evaluating re-writing PAW because of "beyond Leopard" concerns (as mentioned on another thread), will you also be evaluating the possible implementation of some of the wish list items? Some of your users seem to really want several of those... Personally, I like simple -- which is why I'm so glad I found PAW! ;D |
|
|
|
Post by Howard Metcalfe on Aug 26, 2009 14:05:12 GMT -5
I don't know of any program that does have this feature. Legacy for Windows does. Now that you're evaluating re-writing PAW because of "beyond Leopard" concerns (as mentioned on another thread), will you also be evaluating the possible implementation of some of the wish list items? Some of your users seem to really want several of those... Personally, I like simple -- which is why I'm so glad I found PAW! ;D Maybe, but probably not due to the effort just to replicate what's there now. It's just not a doddle!!! |
|
